Showing posts with label infection. Show all posts
Showing posts with label infection. Show all posts
Wednesday, September 17, 2014
Dead Alive (aka Braindead) (1992) Early Peter Jackson Insanity
A Sumatran rat-monkey. A domineering mother-monster. A kung-fu priest. A delinquent's entrails that have a life of their own. A cheery demon baby. A lawnmower shield.
All this and lots more is what you'll find in one of Peter Jackson's early films, the energetic cult classic known as Dead Alive here on our side of the world, and Braindead everywhere else. You may know Jackson as the high-powered director behind the Lord of the Rings and Hobbit movies of recent years. He's won Academy Awards, produced several huge hits, and is generally one of the most well-known directors in the modern era. But before all that, Jackson cut his teeth on wacky, blood-splattered craziness like this movie, or his first feature film, Bad Taste. This was the first Peter Jackson movie I ever saw, and it remains near and dear to my heart.
Taking place in Jackson's native New Zealand during the 50's, the story follows sad-sack mama's boy Lionel (Timothy Balme) as he balances falling for a local gypsy girl, Paquita (Diana Peñalver), and following his mean mom's wishes and commands. When mommy dearest is bitten by a Sumatran rat-monkey and dies, things get a little bit crazy. Old Vera reanimates as a blood-crazed zombie, turning a gang of ne'er-do-wells and her own nurse into ghouls like her. Even the local priest, who put the beatdown on the zombie gang while delivering one of the best lines of dialogue ever ("I kick ass for the LORD!"), is eventually turned as well. Poor Lionel has to keep the monsters hidden in his basement and deal with his lecherous Uncle Les, who wants the house for himself. Before long, Les throws a rockin' party and Lionel tries to sever ties with his mother by using what he thinks is poison to kill her once and for all. Unfortunately, the poison turns out to be what equates to super-steroids for animals and the zombie outbreak is seriously on. The party degenerates into one of THE most gory, insane, and manic sequences in the history of film. Seriously, Dead Alive is still considered one of the goriest movies ever made.
Still, the gore is played for laughs, and after a while, it becomes less "gore" and more "slapstick." All those weird things I mentioned in the beginning are there. What happens when two infected zombies have "relations"? A demon baby that Lionel actually takes for a day out in a way to return to normalcy.
Balme's Lionel is a hero who grows through the movie, and it's not hard to cheer for the guy. Paquita gives him enough confidence to cut the umbilical cord...among a few other things. The movie is absolutely in-your-face, wild, and energetic with kinetic camera angles, quick editing, and a narrative that never slows down.
Dead Alive is a favorite among horror fans, always thought of with a smile or a chuckle. It's definitely horror, but the comedy shines through alongside its darker genre cousin seamlessly. If you have a weak stomach, yeah, you might have a little trouble with things like Lionel's lawnmower shield among many other things. But the movie's hilarious and drive-in-style fun, as well as being a bit of a history lesson about one of the world's top directors.
Until next time, don't visit the Sumatran rat-monkey at your local zoo...
Labels:
1992,
comedy,
gore,
infection,
new zealand,
peter jackson,
zombies
Friday, April 11, 2014
The Bay (2012) That'll Put Me Off Swimming
If you look back at the early, rock-n-roll days of this blog, you'll find an entry in which I wrote a list of things that skeeve me out. One of those things that skeeve me out is an object just under the surface of the water (boats, old buildings, skeletons) as well as things you know are there, but can't see (sharks, bigger boats, Cthulhu).
Well, you might was well add sea bugs to that list because The Bay did its share to do it for me.
The Bay is an interesting film even before you start watching it. Released to little fanfare, it's made in the found footage style and it's an eco-horror film directed by none other than Barry Levinson (Diner, Rain Man, Avalon). It doesn't seem like the type of movie one would expect from Levinson, but good directors often take chances. For the most part, he scored quite well with this increasingly creepy movie with a message.
In a small, idyllic Maryland town, a celebration of its history on Chesapeake Bay brings the town together. But there's a bit of a dark underside. There's high levels of toxicity in the water thanks to a huge chicken processing plant and a cutting-corners filtration plant installed by the mayor to give the illusion of safety. Two researchers know this, but are dead from a mysterious malady before they can turn in the proper proof. Slowly, through the eyes of several security cameras, phones, news cameras, and video conferences, it's obvious that something is happening in the town. People are getting violently sick, developing ugly sores on their bodies. They begin to react violently or irrationally. Then it all just goes downhill from there. Our various emotions are toyed with as we see this horrifying epidemic unfold through a young reporter's tapes, town security cams, a young girl's iPhone, police dash cams, and the one that builds the most tension: the video camera of a young family oblivious of what's happening taking a boat to the town.
Using a cast of talented unknowns, Levinson adds some meat to the bones of the found footage genre. He uses some good jump scares here and there, but it's the creepy atmosphere that slowly builds over time that really made the film something good. The town at the beginning is the town you want to live in, and the town at the end looks like something out of a Romero film. This all happens in such a short amount of time, you wonder how anyone can get out of it or how they could possibly survive. The tension and atmosphere are on display here.
Some viewers may applaud or bemoan the message of pollution and pollution regulation that sits behind the main face of horror here. Keep in mind: this is just a story. It's fiction. It's the fictional story of a fictional situation happening to fictional people because of some other fictional situation. Relax. Personally, I think pollution is pretty much bad all around. I don't want to go swimming in unfiltered chicken poop, and I certainly don't want mutant sea bugs burrowing into my skin and giving me boils the size of dinner plates.
Enjoy the trailer:
Wednesday, May 1, 2013
Quarantine 2: Terminal (2011) Better Than It Should Be
By all rights, I shouldn't have enjoyed Quarantine 2: Terminal.
It's a sequel to a remake that was virtually shot-for-shot like the original. While I thought Quarantine was OK - it starred the phenomenal Jennifer Carpenter, after all - it weakened itself by not going with the original's ([REC]) premise of an evil force and instead going with a "super rabies" disease infection. A sequel, by all rights, shouldn't have been good.
But it was, and I really did enjoy it. Every so often, dear readers, the movie planets align and a sequel that shouldn't exist, not only does but does it pretty well.
Written and directed by John Pogue, the film takes place a short time after the events of the first film, in which a Los Angeles apartment building is sealed off when an infection runs rampant inside. A variety of passengers board a plane on its way to Memphis. After being bitten by a rat in a teacher's carry-on, one of the passengers begins to exhibit signs of infection. When he nearly bites off an attendant's nose, it's safe to say he's on the sick side. Making an emergency landing in Las Vegas, the survivors make it into the terminal, but it's soon quarantined (see what I did there?) and that's when the fun starts. They not only have to evade infected staff, they have to deal with infections to each other, and a betrayal from within. One of the survivors is not what they seem.
There's a great string of tension running through the movie, even as the sequences run toward the formulaic. I've always said that sometimes formulaic works because the formula might be good. You know something will happen at certain times, but in this case it's OK because it falls into place. The added mystery that ties it to the first movie provides the underlying threat, the insinuation that no matter what happens to this motley group of survivors, the story really won't be over.
Quarantine 2: Terminal was a pleasant surprise, and it's nice to have one of those every so often. I'm not sure if the good luck would extend to a sequel, but hey, I'll take this one.
It's a sequel to a remake that was virtually shot-for-shot like the original. While I thought Quarantine was OK - it starred the phenomenal Jennifer Carpenter, after all - it weakened itself by not going with the original's ([REC]) premise of an evil force and instead going with a "super rabies" disease infection. A sequel, by all rights, shouldn't have been good.
But it was, and I really did enjoy it. Every so often, dear readers, the movie planets align and a sequel that shouldn't exist, not only does but does it pretty well.
Written and directed by John Pogue, the film takes place a short time after the events of the first film, in which a Los Angeles apartment building is sealed off when an infection runs rampant inside. A variety of passengers board a plane on its way to Memphis. After being bitten by a rat in a teacher's carry-on, one of the passengers begins to exhibit signs of infection. When he nearly bites off an attendant's nose, it's safe to say he's on the sick side. Making an emergency landing in Las Vegas, the survivors make it into the terminal, but it's soon quarantined (see what I did there?) and that's when the fun starts. They not only have to evade infected staff, they have to deal with infections to each other, and a betrayal from within. One of the survivors is not what they seem.
There's a great string of tension running through the movie, even as the sequences run toward the formulaic. I've always said that sometimes formulaic works because the formula might be good. You know something will happen at certain times, but in this case it's OK because it falls into place. The added mystery that ties it to the first movie provides the underlying threat, the insinuation that no matter what happens to this motley group of survivors, the story really won't be over.
Quarantine 2: Terminal was a pleasant surprise, and it's nice to have one of those every so often. I'm not sure if the good luck would extend to a sequel, but hey, I'll take this one.
Thursday, August 9, 2012
[REC]3: Genesis: Wedding Planning Ain't Easy
I'll go on record right now and say that the Spanish horror franchise of [REC] films is one of the best series of horror films, in my humble, little opinion. I'm sure there are differing opinions, but this is mine. I love [REC] and [REC2] like I love cake. They're both heaping helpings of visceral tension with a claustrophobic, scared-of-the-dark atmosphere as the icing on top. While the franchise is essentially going to be a trilogy, it has a sort of "middle episode" that strays from the usual formula of darkened hallways, scarce lighting, and outright terror. [REC3]: Genesis is definitely a departure from the other two films, especially in tone. While it is a little jarring, that isn't necessarily a bad thing.
Paco Plaza, who co-directed the first two films with Jaume Balagueró, takes the solo helm for this film which, unlike the first two, takes place over a longer period of time. We begin in the afternoon and end the following morning, whereas the others were in real time. There are two huge differences that will either be applauded or derided: one, the use of the first-person camera is not all the way through the entire film, and two, the tone strays from the franchise in that it employs much more humor. Don't get me wrong: it's still full of gore, frights, and outright creepiness. But it's also funny in many parts.
The movie begins with a wedding, and we're introduced to many of the characters, mostly family and close friends of the bride, Clara (Leticia Dolera) and Koldo (Diego Martín). They're a beautiful couple (who look a little like a young Shelley Duvall and Jason Segal), getting married in a beautiful church in a beautiful part of Spain. You just know this idyllic event is going to be ruined by bitey demon-things at some point, and you would not be wrong. In fact, there's a clue early on that tells you who is going to be the first to be all bitey. It's just a sweet wedding and reception (and I love the touch of a DVD menu of the wedding starting the film - trust me, you have to see it, it's quite funny). But when a dear uncle exhibits strange behavior - which gets really strange - all hell breaks loose. The infection that spreads in the [REC] films is fast-acting and truly evil, in every sense of the word. The survivors have to scramble and in the chaos, Clara and Koldo are separated. The driving force of the film kicks in here: Clara and Koldo's love and desire to be together versus the evil demonic infection. What happens after that is all-out grindhouse-y fun with some really clever moments (that I can't really spoil), even if it does stray from the already-successful formula.
It's a change of pace from the first two films, to which, as a sequel, this film will always be compared. There's a wackiness that threads its way through the horror, involving things like ancient armor, a Spongebob knock-off, and a badass, chainsaw-toting bride. Seriously, when Clara has had enough and grabs that chainsaw, you know it's on like Donkey Kong, baby. [REC]3: Genesis is like a quick breather in between more intense episodes, and the franchise is set to finish off soon with [REC] 4: Apocalypse which tells you right there where the infection is heading.
A fun, strange, and still-terrifying film from a country that produces some great horror films, [REC]3: Genesis isn't the same animal as its predecessors, but it's still good and still has that sense of hopeless doom...with one small glimmer of hope, but I'll let you figure that one out for yourselves.
Until next time, chopper passengers, here's the trailer:
Labels:
2012,
apocalytpic,
cinema verite,
demons,
disease,
found footage,
infection,
spain
Thursday, July 21, 2011
Rammbock: Berlin Undead (2010) Short Movie, Short Review
Clocking in at just over an hour, the German infection horror offering Rammbock: Berlin Undead offers some really good moments in what turned out to be a mostly decent little horror flick sponsored in the United States by the wonderful horror news website Bloody Disgusting. It's a pretty straightforward story with basic undertones of longing and lingering loyalty. No frills, as the story takes place in one location, an apartment building in Berlin that falls under attack by victims of a mysterious illness that causes them to become raving, mad-dashing, bitey zombie-ish thingies.
Milquetoast Michael is in Berlin to return keys to his very-recently-ex-girlfriend Gabi, who isn't home when he arrives. He meets young plumber's assistant Harper just in time to witness the plumber working on Gabi's apartment turn into a frothing-at-the-mouth nutjob with milky eyes. They get out of that situation, but quickly realize it's not just one rabid dude teeming with infection, but all of Berlin. They hole up in Gabi's apartment, with Michael worrying about his ex - who hasn't returned his frantic phone calls - and Harper worrying about his family. From the window, they watch as those in the courtyard are slaughtered, and meet other survivors through their own windows. Michael sets about finding a way to a man's apartment after the man offers food in trade for some sedatives for his infected wife. This begins an odyssey through the next apartment and into the attic, where Michael finds one thing he's looking for, but it's not what he had hoped. The rest of the movie is not only the struggle for survival, but Michael's own transformation from a relative wimp pining for his ex-girlfriend to a resourceful hero for those he meets on his journey to escape. Not going to spoil it here for you, but the movie ends on a bittersweet note.
There's nothing fancy about Rammbock: Berlin Undead. It tells its story, and tells it better than some vehicles for infection horror. There's an air of urgency and hopelessness laced throughout, with signs of hope just enough to not make it a total downer. As anyone who reads this knows, I liked to see the scale of devastation in these movies, even for a glimpse. The scene where Michael casts his eyes on Berlin from a rooftop, as shown in the American movie poster, sums up the insane odds against anyone surviving the plague. The infected - not sure if calling them undead is accurate, since we never really know if they die and come back - are of the fast-running, rabid variety, as seen in 28 Days Later and [REC], only with eyes that film over when infection fully occurs. I found the characters intriguing from the main characters to the brother/sister across the way (a scene where she cries on the balcony is heartbreaking) to the silent tattooed man with what appears to be a bite on his arm. The man who offered food and his infected wife have a particularly tragic scene. While Rammbock didn't offer me anything new, it was tried and true, and sometimes that's just fine.
Honestly, it's not all that bad of a way to spend an hour if you're in the mood for some of your basic flash mob zombies.
Until next time, fellow survivors...no more flights to Berlin for a while. Let the infection blow over. Here, enjoy the trailer:
Monday, May 30, 2011
In The Mouth Of Madness (1994) Getting Lovecrafty
When John Carpenter wants to end the world, he does it in such interesting ways.
In The Thing, he hinted that a parasitic, all-consuming alien life form would spread to the rest of the world unless it was stopped at that lonely Antarctic outpost. The son of the Anti-God would usher in its unholy father in Prince of Darkness unless several desperate people ended the threat in a run down old church. However, with In The Mouth of Madness, it's reality itself under assault from the Old Ones made famous in the literary world by H. P. Lovecraft. And what can one man played by Sam Neill do?
In short: nothing.
Lovecraft was known for penning tales of unseen horrors, monsters so vile and so primed to crack reality at its seams that to glimpse them would cause instant madness. The whole Cthulhu mythos? That was him. Casting shadows over Innsmouth? Lovecraft. The fish people who worship the mad god Dagon? Yep. He even had a story called "At The Mountains Of Madness," so it's a pretty fair bet that In The Mouth of Madness is a tip of the cap to his writing genius.
But Lovecraft isn't the only prolific, talented writer showcased in the film. There are several obvious nods to my own longtime favorite, Stephen King: the northeast region, the small town, the name of the antagonist author (Sutter Cane = Stephen King). In truth, the entire film is about fiction, about the written word and its power over reality. Words guiding us to believe anything, then using that power to fuel...well, in this case, the return of the Old Ones. And that's not a good thing, dear readers.
See, Sam Neill plays John Trent, insurance investigator extraordinaire. When we first meet him, he's a little on the...nutty side. He's locked up in an asylum when he's visited by Dr. Wrenn (David Warner), who wants the lowdown on what brought him there. So John tells him the whole, horrifying story...which begins when he's called in by a publisher (Charlton Heston) to find their missing cash cow, the eccentric mega-superstar writer, Sutter Cane (Jurgen Prochnow), who has a final, blockbuster novel to get into the stores. The name of the book? "In The Mouth of Madness." After reading some of Cane's horrific novels, John has bad dreams, weird feelings, and a sudden revelation: the covers of Cane's books can be manipulated into a map of New Hampshire, revealing the location of a fictional town called Hobb's End. Accompanied by editor Linda Styles (Julie Carmen), John sets out to find Hobb's End. After a very trippy...er...trip, he finds it.
Hobb's End is like a ghost town with some eerie little residents, like the strange old lady up at the hotel bearing the name of a real Lovecraft character (Pickman from "Pickman's Model"). Discovering a menacing-looking church on the outskirts of town, John and Linda investigate and find Sutter Cane, that's for sure.
From there, things get really freaky in the little hamlet of Hobb's End. Linda goes after Cane, but she's helpless against the new, vast power that the Old Ones have granted the author. Then it's down to John, and his role in what is essentially the end of all that is. John slowly discovers the truth about Hobb's End, its residents, and Sutter Cane, and give the man credit, he stands up to it the best he can. But despite his obvious strength, Cane is far, far too powerful. John is meant to deliver the end of the world, typed just as Cane envisioned it, and there's nothing he can do.
The ending doesn't present any in-your-face world destruction scenes. In that Carpenter never shows you out-and-out chaos, he's making it even more frightening. John Trent may be the last sane person on Earth, and we're hanging on to that final unraveling thread with him. We know something's going on in the world, but just like Lovecraft did in his stories, we don't see it. The knowing is terrifying enough.
In The Mouth of Madness isn't linear in its storytelling. Much of the story is a flashback controlled by John's memories. But there's a bit of meta-storytelling going on here as well. Sutter Cane goes on and on about controlling reality, and he may be controlling what we see in the movie as well. During a fun little scene on a bus late in the movie, he proclaims that he "is God now" and asks John, "Did I ever tell you my favorite color is blue?" When John snaps awake, everything is indeed blue. But throughout the movie, the color blue shows up, especially in peoples' eyes. Has Cane not only been controlling what John sees, but what we see as well? Possibly. Something to think about. I love when movies play outside the sandbox, and Carpenter has never been afraid to do that.
What a fun movie In The Mouth of Madness turns out to be. It's the third in Carpenter's loose Apocalypse Trilogy and it can be argued that it's the most dire of circumstances - certainly it's the most bleak in terms of ultimate endings. The little nods to Lovecraft and King are a kick to uncover. Sam Neill does a fantastic job as a true "omega man," part detective, part skeptic, all victim. Definitely a great closing to the Apocalypse Trilogy, and a great way to spend a movie-watching evening.
In fact, get a hold of all three movies and watch them back-to-back. It'll put a little sunshine in your day.
Now here, enjoy the trailer:
Thursday, May 19, 2011
Stake Land (2010) Quality Over Quantity
Everyone knows I love me some infection horror, from Dawn Of The Dead to the [REC] series. I know that technically, vampire movies can be classified as "infection horror." One bite (or more, depending on the mythos) from a vampire and it's all over, much like a bite from the undead. Vampire flicks, though, are usually lumped into their own genre, a rich, traditional genre that has its roots in the forever-creepy Nosferatu and has been somewhat co-opted by the Movie-Franchise-That-Shall-Not-Be-Named-But-Has-Sparkly-Bloodsuckers, which dilutes the potent potion with a strong history behind it.
Stake Land made me love the genre all over again.
From the people who brought you the underrated Mulberry Street comes this truly creative and compelling take on a world decimated by a vampiric plague. Director Jim Mickle and co-writer Nick Damici took a small budget and loads of passion, mixed it up in a big bucket marked "good stuff," and threw it on film as Stake Land.
It goes something like this: It's a world where vampires have taken over. Considered a plague, it spreads fast, causing people to become mindless, blood-craving killers. No one knows how it started, and much like George A. Romero's Dead movies, the origin is left a mystery. Fine by me, since the origin's not the story here. We are introduced to Martin (Connor Paolo), a teenage boy preparing to escape with his family. When he witnesses them all - mother, father, and infant sibling - slaughtered by a vampire, he's saved by one bad-ass vampire killer simply known as Mister (Damici). Mister takes Martin under his wing as they battle their way towards New Eden, a supposed vampire-free area in Canada. Along the way, they run afoul of the dangerous, militant religious nutjobs called The Brotherhood, led by Jebedia (Michael Cerveris of Fringe). See, Mister rescues a nun from what turns out to be Jebedia's son and a buddy, and Mister tends to play for keeps, human or vampire. The nun, known as Sister (Kelly McGillis of Top Gun), joins them on their journey before they're set upon for the first time by The Brotherhood. Eventually, Martin and Mister reunite and meet a couple more friends along the way, the pregnant Belle (Danielle Harris of the Halloween films) and former Marine Willy (Sean Nelson). Sister rejoins them, and it seems like the perfect family unit, heading straight for the border.
But it's never that easy.
Not everyone is safe, not even ones who traditionally are safe in movies like this. In one of the most well-done and heartbreaking scenes, you're witness to just how far The Brotherhood will go to not only get to Mister, but simply sow terror and fear, something they'd apparently done on a large scale. It's during a moment of rest, of happiness, in an idyllic militia-protected town that The Brotherhood does the unthinkable, and something entirely original: they airdrop vampires. Airdrop. Vampires. Yeah, that's right. Think about it. A simple night of neighborly goodwill, toe-tapping music, and most of all, rest for our by-now beloved characters. Then it happens. It happens and in the short time for the carnage to unfold, you really want to get your hands around the necks of The Brotherhood. It's chilling, and it breaks your heart.
So who makes it to New Eden? What happens in the cold hills just miles away from this alleged haven?
I'm not going to spoil it for you. The ending is ambiguous, as it should be. No one is truly safe in the reality of Stake Land. It's an ending that makes sense and even though it is left open to what happens to the remaining characters, it doesn't leave you saying, "Whaaaat?" It ends, but only the way you believe it ends as the credits roll.
The acting is wonderfully sound. Only Jebedia is portrayed a little over-the-top, but he's an effective villain nonetheless: you WANT to hate this religious fanatic. And you do. Damici is grizzled and understated, no-nonsense in his role, and much like his character Clutch in Mulberry Street, he's someone for whom you can really cheer. Paolo is fantastic as Martin, a young boy thrust into becoming a man in the worst possible environment. He's both tough and awkward, vulnerable and still possessed of great inner strength. I cannot take away from the others in the group, as Harris is immensely sympathetic as the young mother-to-be and Nelson is solid as the ex-Marine. McGillis is a real standout, as the nun struggling with traditional faith and the new necessities of the world.
Like all great infection horror works, the characters are the focus, but there is an underlying theme tying them together. A theme of faith rings both loudly and subtly through the film. The Brotherhood represents the current state of "mob religion" in the world, people who would use faith as a weapon or an excuse to hate. Look around. It's everywhere you look today. The traveling band of heroes represent the true, inner faith of people who only want to survive and only want to do good for each other and themselves. The Brotherhood are those loudmouth, ignorant people who demand you think they way they do, like those Westboro nutjobs. The heroes are that pastor who greets others at the door of his modest church with a friendly "all are welcome."
Also, let me get one thing perfectly straight: the similarities between Stake Land and the wonderful Zombieland end with the names. I've heard people say, "oh, so it's Zombieland with vampires." No. It is not. Stake Land has not a lick of comedy in it. The world is bleak, it is dying, and it will never be the same. Don't let the title throw you off in the slightest. We're talking two different movies here.
Stake Land might be hard to find at the moment. It's not playing on that many screens, although check your on-demand features with your local cable company. That's how I saw it. It's well worth the hunt and it stands head and shoulders above most big-budget horror fare in that it's an honest, passionate, creative movie. One that actually tells a tried and true story (getting safely from point A to point B) without a hint of stagnation.
Well, I've gushed enough for now. Go judge for yourself, and I sincerely hope you find it as fulfilling an experience as I did. If you don't like it...oh, well. I won't hold it against you.
Until next time, dear readers, don't stay out when the sun goes down. It might be a little bitey out tonight.
Now enjoy the trailer...
Sunday, May 1, 2011
28 Days Later (2003) A Little Case Of The Rage
It's become a classic of modern horror arguments: should zombies be fast or slow? "Fast" increases the urgency, but "slow" - the more traditional choice - allows for more character development. Well, this argument as it pertains to Danny Boyle's 28 Days Later can be thrown out the window for one very obvious reason: the movie isn't about zombies.
In fact, the antagonistic force of nature in 28 Days Later isn't comprised of dead-becoming-undead people at all. They're still alive, but infected with something called The Rage. So that argument I mentioned? Save it for another day because while we're talking about infection horror here, the infected are still technically alive. The danger, though, is still the same as undead movies: the infected are going to chase you down and viciously attack you until you're a) dead or b) infected as well. The disease takes hold quick, and makes you twitch and growl with madness, much like a person suffering the after-effects of a late-night Heineken run and too many burritos. Not that I would know...ahem.
Despite the fast-moving nature of the infected, there are plenty of moments of character development in the film and that's the balance that helps hold this film higher. It's a wild, kinetic ride when the action is in full swing, yet subdued and soft during scenes of real human interaction, and quietly tense during moments you know something is about to happen.
Literally 28 days after a militant animal rights group naively sets an infected chimp free, London is an abandoned urban wasteland. Bicycle courier Jim (Cillian Murphy) awakens from a coma to an empty hospital, and a seemingly empty city. When he's set upon by a group of infected people, he's rescued by Selena (Naomie Harris) and Mark (Noah Huntley) who fill him in on what's happened. The infection has apparently spread like wildfire, and London - as well as most of England - has been evacuated.
The trio heads to Jim's house, where he discovers the final, peaceful fate of his parents. While there, neighbors attack, resulting in an injury to Mark. Without hesitation, Selena kills Mark, knowing the infection can manifest in minutes. We never know for sure if the injury would have led to infection or not, but the scene marked the stark new reality of post-infection London.
Selena and Jim eventually meet up with Frank (Brendan Gleeson) and Hannah (Megan Burns), a father and daughter surviving in the upper floors of an apartment building. The four of them hit the road, as they're running low on supplies and follow the signal of soldiers broadcasting from near devastated Birmingham. They find an abandoned outpost, and Frank is infected when a drop of Rage-filled blood gets in his eye. He is gunned down by the arriving soldiers, who take the others to their base in an old mansion. They meet Major West (Christopher Eccleston), who welcomes them warmly at first before revealing that he plans on keeping the human race alive by forcing the women into sex with the soldiers, making Jim expendable. Caught trying to escape, the girls are separated from Jim, who is to be executed the next morning.
The execution doesn't go as planned. Jim escapes and lures soldiers to the roadblock where they first met. After taking care of those soldiers, Jim makes his way back to the mansion, sets loose an infected soldier to cause mayhem, and goes about rescuing Selena and Hannah, almost meeting the business end of Selena's machete due to the brutal way in which he kills a soldier. On the way out, Jim is shot by West and after leaving the Major to the tender mercies of an infected soldier, the girls hurry Jim someplace where they can tend to his wounds, which may or may not be fatal, depending on which ending you prefer. And yes, there is more than one ending, the happiest one being the default at the end of the theatrical release.
Boyle always has an eye for the stylistic, from Trainspotting to the more recent 127 Hours. In his films, he manages to reach past the wild or unique circumstances of the characters to get right to the heart of their being. I remember watching Trainspotting and thinking how much I loved and cared about the characters, even if they had less than redeeming qualities. The same could be said for 28 Days Later. Even minor characters have depth to them, and the major characters - you just want them to live. You just want this makeshift family to get to where they're going. The acting is as good as expected in a Danny Boyle film, with Murphy and Harris as real standouts.
There are some really great moments in it as well. Jim's awakening and wandering around a beautifully empty London is haunting and sad. Jim's standoff at the roadblock is surrealistically bad-ass. His rescue of and subsequent brush with a machete wielded by Selena is heartbeat-fast tension. There are plenty to choose from, believe me.
There are some really great moments in it as well. Jim's awakening and wandering around a beautifully empty London is haunting and sad. Jim's standoff at the roadblock is surrealistically bad-ass. His rescue of and subsequent brush with a machete wielded by Selena is heartbeat-fast tension. There are plenty to choose from, believe me.
Plus, I have to admit. It's weird looking back on this movie and seeing Doctor Who (Eccleston) face off with The Scarecrow (Murphy) after the death of Mad-Eye Moody (Gleeson).
That's the nerd in me.
28 Days Later is kinetic and solemn at the same time, at the time a new look at infection horror when the genre was really starting to break out again. It's always worth a look and makes you think twice when you hear about a new strain of the flu making its rounds. Cover your mouth! And eyes, nose, ears...
Labels:
2003,
28 days later,
england,
infection,
not zombies,
zombies
Monday, November 1, 2010
The Walking Dead Premiere - Some Things Are Worth The Wait

I've been disappointed by hype before, or at best, just a little let down. Way in the back of my mind, I feared the same would happen with AMC's new original series, The Walking Dead. It finally - after months of waiting - premiered appropriately on October 31 to the well-oiled hype machine that is AMC. That station, I tell you, is riding a serious wave of successful original series like Mad Men and Breaking Bad. They, like HBO, seem to set the bar very high in terms of quality, so I knew the series was in good hands. But that nagging fear remained in the back of my head: "What if it's just so-so...or worse, what if it sucks?"

Now, I may or may not review each episode. I haven't decided yet. More likely, I'll bookend the season with reviews starting with this one. Needless to say, if was borrowing a page from Roger Ebert's book, I'd be giving this a huge thumbs-up.
I love infection horror, and that's evident in my blog. Hell, I prefaced watching this premiere with my annual Halloween viewing of 1978's Dawn of the Dead. More than that, I'm a huge fan of the comic book from Image Comics, created and written by Robert Kirkman, who also co-produced the series (Kirkman also writes a superhero series called Invincible that I hope makes it to the screen as well). Knowing he had a huge say in what went down, and knowing director/screenwriter extraordinaire Frank Darabont was in charge, put me more and more at ease.
Many of you have already seen it, and I'm not going to spoil things for the rest of you. Basically, the plot follows the book for the most part: Deputy Rick Grimes wakes up after a gunshot puts him in a coma to find that the world has really changed. There aren't any living people that he sees right away, but there are plenty of dead bodies...and some of them move. Rick leaves the hospital and returns home to find his wife and son gone. He meets Morgan and Duane, a father and son living in a house once occupied by Rick's neighbors, and they get him up to speed about the disease that has reanimated the dead. In a brilliant but tragic addition to the mythos, Morgan and Duane agonize over the sight of Morgan's wife, Duane's mother, returning day after day as a zombie. Rick intends to move on to Atlanta to find his family, hoping Morgan and Duane will join him later. He finds a horse and rides into the city, but finds nothing but hungry ex-people. Trapped in a tank, Rick hears someone calling him "dumbass" on the radio (if you read the book, you know who it is) as the episode comes to a close.

I skimmed over quite a bit of it, but really, if you're able to watch it, you need to see and hear the experience. The flies buzzing? Nice touch. There are scenes that are perfectly silent, and the confusion and disorientation is enough to drive you crazy because you have no music cues to warn you, or tell you how to feel. The disease spares no one. Yes, a little girl zombie falls in the first few minutes. I know the "politically correct" will be up in arms: "what kind of image is that to show our precious children?" Please. It's horror. What would you do, give it Twizzlers and positively reinforce it not to bite you? Same with the horse. That's in the comic as well. It's hard to see, but it portrays how a zombified world would be. The living dead don't care about cuteness. They're just hungry forces of nature. Another gory, but great, touch was the completely masticated woman lying in the hospital hallway. Darabont told so much story in Rick's post-awakening scene with hardly a word. The half-woman bicycle zombie is straight from the book, but Darabont adds so much pathos and emotion to each scene, it's like an enhanced version of an already-great work. I really hope the rest of the season holds up to this fantastic premiere.
I can't enough good things about it. I've seen overwhelmingly positive reviews, and mine stands as my own. I'm sure there are some who didn't like it, but that's life. Or undead life. So many puns, so little time.
Until later, my friends, try to be awake when the zombie apocalypse comes. And be sure to catch The Walking Dead on AMC, Sundays at 10 p.m.
Monday, August 23, 2010
Pontypool (2008) A Different Kind of Infection

Now, let's get some similarities out of the way. You may recall I took a look at a little film called Dead Air, which has several similar plot points. Radio talk show host trapped with some crew members while an infectious outbreak runs wild outside, of which we see very little. Seems like the same, but the paths they take are quite different. The characters are a little alike, but their goals are different: one is survival and trying to figure out how to stop something, the other is survival and trying to get back to family.

Slowly, things start getting strange. Reports trickle, then pour in, about people behaving strangely. Eventually, Ken Loney calls in, frantic that people are attacking other people, chanting slogans over and over. He mentions frantic attacks and instances of cannibalism as he runs, frightened and trying to hide. The BBC even calls in at one point to ask Mazzy his take on this horrible situation.


Sydney becomes infected and thinks her fate is sealed. Mazzy comes up with a plan: change the meanings of words. Change them so that the infection can't root itself in the speaker. It's a pretty creative little idea there to infect certain English words, then use meaning as an anchor for the disease to take effect. Well, it works. Sydney is cured.
But is it too late?

The idea of infectious words made me think of DC Comics' Final Crisis, which I'm apt to do quite often anyway. You may remember a lengthy blog on the epic, apocalyptic comic series I wrote some time ago. The Anti-Life Equation, associated with Jack Kirby's Fourth World creations, is "mathematical proof that [supervillain] Darkseid is the true ruler of the universe" and is designed to grind humanity down to depressed, oppressed husks. If you have the time, read writer extraordinaire Grant Morrison's explanation:

When the Anti-Life Equation is finally loosed on the world, it's first done through the Internet:

Infected words. Think about it. Terrifying, really. Communication as we know it would have to change. In the movie, they could change languages, but what if...? What if the infection jumped languages? What if it infected the written word?
Yikes.
Well, fellow survivors, just be glad the zombies outside our gates don't even talk. I don't think I'd want to hear their infected words...
Until next time, folks...

Friday, July 9, 2010
The Crazies (2010) Not All Remakes Are Bad

The word "remake" sends chills down a horror fan's spine more than zombies, ghosts, and crazed holiday-themed killers. Lately, the horror genre has been on a remake binge, especially with foreign horror films like [REC] (as Quarantine), Let The Right One In (as Let Me In), and Martyrs. How they can dilute the magic of the originals can probably be answered with the phrase "cha-ching." It is really all about the Benjamins. But American horror classics haven't been excluded either, with reboots to Halloween, A Nightmare On Elm Street, and the very well-made remake of Dawn of the Dead to name a few. When I saw George Romero's 1973 cult classic The Crazies was on the remake list, that old familiar skepticism was the first feeling I had. But there is that "you never know" feeling. I come back to the Dawn of the Dead remake - a retelling that was done right: just enough of the original to pay respects, but creative enough to stand on its own. 2010's version does pay decent respect to its elders, but does have enough strength to stand on its own without being too "slick" or too "let's pander to the kids who hang out at the mall" for its own good.
Where the 1973 version was directed by Romero, Breck Eisner handles the chores this time around with quite the capable cast. The small town of Ogden Marsh, Iowa, is just about perfect. Small-town folks enjoying small-town activities like the opening day of high-school baseball. Everyone knows everyone. In fact, when one of the townsfolk shows up at the game with a shotgun, Sheriff David Dutton (Timothy Olyphant) assumes he's just drunk. Forced to react when the guy raises the gun, Dutton shoots him down, an action he immediately regrets.
But former drunk Rory wasn't the only one exhibiting strange behavior. Farmer Bill worries his wife by staring into space and repeating words and phrases. Sheriff Dutton's wife, Judy (Radha Mitchell) examines him and, finding nothing wrong on the surface, sends him home. Later that night, Bill methodically traps his family in the house and burns it down. He expresses no regret or even knowledge of what he's done as he's placed in a holding cell. Dutton and his trusty deputy Russell Clank (Joe Anderson) investigate first the body of a dead soldier attached to a parachute, then a downed plane in a nearby lake that feeds...that's right...into the town's water supply.
Bill begins suffering more marked symptoms of something pretty nasty. I mean, look at the above picture. This disease - later referred to as "Trixie" - doesn't just give you a light cough and send you on your way. Dutton wants to shut off the water supply, but the Mayor is having nothing of that as he swims in his oddly-placed swimming pool. There are crops to consider, after all. Dutton doesn't care, so he takes the illegal course of action and shuts it off anyway.
It might be too late at this point. Other residents are feeling the crazy, acting strangely and deserting the streets. Then they get violent. Sheriff Dutton convinces Judy they should leave, but they are captured by haz-mat-suited military guys and herded into a makeshift quarantine area at the local school. They're suddenly separated when Judy registers as having a fever, one of Trixie's symptoms. In reality, she's pregnant, but the military doesn't listen to David's pleading as they take her to a room and strap her down on a gurney in a room full of other patients on gurneys, most of which are sick with Trixie.
Some locals stage a coup and in the confusion, all the townspeople either escape or are gunned down. David makes it out and finds Russell, and together they set out to rescue Judy. Just in time, too, as the principal - now infected - is going from gurney to gurney, impaling random people with a pitchfork. Before he can kill Judy or Becca (Danielle Panabaker), David guns him down. The four make it out of town, barely avoiding some thrill-seeking hunters who may have been nuts before Trixie. They're now hunting people, infected or not. Arriving at Becca's boyfriend's farm, they plan to wait out the military invasion and the infection, or at least get out of town. Some military guys show up anyway and kill both Becca's boyfriend and his mother, seemingly without cause. David and Russell capture a soldier and find out more about what has happened before letting him go. Their only option becomes clear: get as far away as possible as Ogden Marsh is about to be wiped off the map.

Exhausted, both physically and mentally, they come across Russell's car, which he had told them had been forced off the road. Seeing a vehicle approaching and sensing it belongs to the military, Russell throws out a strip, puncturing the tires and causing the car to crash. David's not happy; he wanted to interrogate the driver. The driver's alive, and reveals that Trixie is indeed a biological weapon, and that the whole area will have to be purged in order to contain it. Russell immediately places a bullet in the guy's head as the trusty deputy begins to show signs of Trixie. He even levels the gun at David and Judy as they continue walking.
David manages to wrestle the gun away later, and forces Russell to come to terms with his infection. They discover a roadblock and Russell sacrifices himself to ensure that David and Judy can get past and continue their escape. Russell Clank, like his 1973 predecessor, dies a heroic death, and even gets to say the best line in the movie to the anonymous military/science guys: "Fuck you for what you've done."
David and Judy find a truck stop, completely empty. The military has killed everyone they herded into trucks to "let go." Not only that, the insane hunters from earlier are there and make escape just a tad more difficult for our intrepid couple. David and Judy finally make their long-awaited getaway in a huge semi truck.
Using a stolen radio, they track the countdown until Ogden Marsh is destroyed and the bomb blast nearly kills them. They crawl from the wreckage and look back at the mushroom cloud burning over the town they loved. Continuing on to Cedar Rapids, they wearily move towards the big city.
The big city which is now seen from a satellite picture, containing those feared words: "initiate containment protocol."
For a remake, I really dug the 2010 version of The Crazies. It dove right into the action and didn't let up, only taking moments here and there to let the characters advance a little. The cast was very good and, most importantly, the movie didn't insult my intelligence. It wasn't a bunch of teens who could be cast on some network teen drama prancing around and looking beautiful while spouting nudge-nudge-wink-wink snarks at each other, or breaking the fourth wall for that matter. I've long been a fan of Timothy Olyphant and Radha Mitchell, and they really didn't disappoint. Joe Anderson was extremely good as Clank, a role I really loved in the original.

There were some interesting differences between the original and the remake, none of which really took away from each other:
* Clank was a deputy sheriff instead of a fireman, and didn't have a thing for Judy.
* Judy and David were married, where in the original, they were boyfriend/girlfriend.
* Judy survives, where in the original, only David makes it out. Also, in the original, David is captured and thumbs his nose at the whole military/science complex when they lament they have no immune survivors to base an antidote on. David knows he's immune.
* Two important side stories were done away with: Dr. Watts trying to find the antidote, and the disturbing story of Artie and his daughter, Kathie. Although, I practically CHEERED when Lynn Lowry - who portrayed Kathie in the original - made a cameo as an infected resident riding a bike and singing in the middle of town.
* The infected are changed physically in the remake, where in the original, the changes were more psychological. I wished they had done a tribute to the Knitting Needle Granny from the 1973 movie, though.
Good movie, really. It isn't on the level of another George Romero remake, the Dawn of the Dead redo, in my opinion, but absolutely worth my time and money. Fine acting, great pacing, and a really good script. If you must do a remake, try and do it like this, if you can, Hollywood. Thank you.
Well, fellow survivors, it's back to the chopper to guide more people to the shelter. Careful with the water you drink. You don't want to catch Trixie.
Stay cool and see you next time...

Thursday, June 24, 2010
[REC] 2 (2009) Yep, Afraid Of The Dark Again

It's no secret I'm a gigantic fan of the masterful Spanish horror film [REC]. Go back and read my review of it to see just how lovingly I spoke of it. When I heard a sequel was in the works, I had one of those rare reactions to news of a continuing story: joy. It wasn't going to be just a sequel with different characters, same story as the first, but with a bigger budget and more "Hollywood-like" promotion. It had some of those traits, but it was more than those. It did have different characters, but in a logical way. The story is only the same because it's a continuation of the first movie. In fact, it starts about 15 minutes after [REC] finishes. It dives in and doesn't look back for one instant. Well...maybe one instant, but that's towards the end of the movie, and I'm not spoiling it here because it's a chiller.

I'll tell you now: this review won't be like most others. There won't be a detailed blow-by-blow here. The entire movie is pretty straightforward and full of spoilers that you really need to see for yourself. So let me give you some of the basics and we'll go from there...
Not long after the first movie ends, a special operations group prepares to enter the quarantined apartment building along with a member of the Ministry of Health in order to get some control of the situation. There's some nostalgia for the viewer upon entering that old building. There's that enormous bloodstain in the lobby along with empty handcuffs attached to the stairs. It's about then you remember something that the new characters don't know: not all of the infected died and you know they're just running around somewhere in this building. Revisiting (well, for us anyway) the penthouse, there's a little reminder of what the characters are dealing with through the pictures, the Evil Dead-like tape recording, and the murky atmosphere.
After some eerie music starts playing in an apartment, one of the special ops team runs afoul of some infected and quickly becomes one himself.
They lock him in a room and the dude from the Ministry of Health drives a knife into the door, then hangs a rosary from it. This actually stops the infected. Yeah, and that guy from the Ministry of Health? Owen is his name, and he's from a ministry, all right, but it's not the one of health. He's an agent of the Vatican with a license to exorcise, and he's kicking ass and taking rosary beads. The other officers aren't too happy about being deceived, and they're even more perturbed when they discover the real reason they entered this death trap: Owen needs to obtain the blood of the first possession victim, Niña Medeiros, kept somewhere in the darkened, ruined apartment that was home to a previous Vatican agent who experimented on Medeiros. Oh, and for a glimpse at the Medeiros girl, watch the ending of [REC]. Yeah, that's her. Shiver at your convenience now.
There are several attacks on Owen and the officers, and some by very recognizable faces from the first movie:

Around the confusion of one attack, a seemingly uninfected man is killed and thrown over the guardrail. The agents catch a glimpse of another party of uninfected people before another wave of attacks occur, splitting them up - which is never a good thing, face it. A frantic and revealing skirmish with the little girl from the first movie that ultimately ends the point of view from the agents' lone camera.
The film goes back a bit and starts down a different path as we meet three young pranksters who are high on adventure and daring-do. They think descending into the sewers and coming up into the quarantined building will be a hoot. Not exactly. They meet one of the firemen from the first movie who didn't go inside, and the father of the infected little girl, who are desperately trying to reach their friends and family inside. They find themselves locked - rather, welded - inside the apartment building. From there, it's a parallel story to that of the special operations team until they all meet up in an apartment. That pivotal scene leads to the final, white knuckle, screaming descent of the roller coaster as the ultimate push to either finish the mission (according to Owen) or simply survive begins.
I honestly can't get into the rest of the movie here. I could, and I could spoil everything for you, but I don't want to do that. I want you to go into this movie with the same blank slate I did, knowing what might happen, but feeling that thrill along the way as you discover what actually does happen. The ending is chilling not so much for what you see, but for what you could see if the film hadn't ended. And that's all I'll tell you. Even the lead-up to the ending includes clues and tip-offs that are better left uncovered by you as you watch.
[REC]2 is a brilliant sequel in my eyes not only because it's wild, intense ride, but because it's a logical progression from the first film. You see characters from the first one - logically - because they've been infected and weren't "killed" in the first movie. Scroll back and see that picture with the bald fireman to see what I mean. If you'd seen the first movie, you know who that is.
When you have entries in the "found footage" or "cinema verite" genre, there are inevitable comparisons to The Blair Witch Project, simply because that was the film that made the mainstream audience aware of the style. Makes some sense, but the films are worlds apart. There was one film that the [REC] series compares favorably to, and that's Demoni (Demons) from 1985, and a film that I gushed about in another review. I'm not the only one who saw that similarity, as my friend Jim from Movie Brain Rot mentioned it to me as well in a discussion. A dark setting and rapid infection from a nefarious source, nasty fluids and frantic escape plans - it's a nod and a wink, however intentional, to Lamberto Bava's Demoni.
Without spoiling anything for you, allow me to list a few indelible images and scenes that make [REC]2 so much of a trip
* Revisiting old settings: the lobby, the penthouse, the bloody landing, the fabric store. You definitely should see the first one again to fully appreciate it all.
* The building itself, a character in its own right. It's like a labyrinth, and seems larger on the inside than it does outside. The apartments seem to go on forever, especially in the dark.
* Ah, the dark. The darkness itself is not only a brilliant mood-setter, but much more important of an element than you think. Trust me, you'll see.
* The rocket. I'm sorry, but one scene involving some fireworks made me laugh out loud.
* The continuity. You'll find yourself saying, "ah, so that's where that came from." Not only that, but the camera manages to catch important establishing shots that allow you, the viewer, to figure certain things out. A film that makes you use your brain? *gasp*
* The "interference" that crops up here and there on the film. Watch when it occurs, and it only adds to the chilling air of what's happening.
* There's a scene involving a small pool of water that will give you shivers when you wrap your mind around what happens. See my reference to the "darkness" above.
* The ending. Yeah.
It's safe to say that I love this movie, and that's not just because I watched a pair of stinkers before it. [REC]2 has everything I love in a horror movie: thrills and chills, an enthusiastic air about it, clever use of atmosphere and setting, moments that let you figure out the details, a feeling that you can't control what's happening thanks to a better use of first person than most "found footage" films. It may not be everyone's cup of tea, but from what I've seen, the tea table I'm sitting at is crowded.
Now, who wants biscuits?
Until next time, fellow survivors, the rules remain the same: don't get bitten. Now enjoy the trailer for this fine film, [REC]2:

Labels:
2009,
cinema verite,
darkness,
found footage,
infection,
possession,
sequel,
spain
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)